Blue hue admired on Ford F-150

Caption- Ford is runaway best-seller among half-ton pickups. (Bud Wells photos)

The 2019 Ford F-150 SuperCrew pickup sat in my driveway and Jan was working in one of her flower beds when neighbors Dennis and Marsha, out for a walk, stopped to chat with her.

Commenting on the pickup, one of them told Jan, “the color is delightful.” Ford calls the exterior finish “velocity blue,” and it is a standout on the big, four-door, half-ton truck.

When Dennis and his wife moved into the neighborhood seven or eight years ago, they were driving a little Smart car. It was blue, too, if I remember correctly. Smart cars will no longer be sold in the U.S. and Canada after the 2019 model year, it was announced last week by parent company Mercedes-Benz. The Smart was never a strong seller over here.

The neighbors now drive a new subcompact SUV crossover – it’s blue, also.

The blue hue, growing in popularity, is sixth most popular new-vehicle color, according to PPG, which lists the top color choices, in order, as white, black, gray, silver and red.

Pickups, regardless of color, sell very well throughout Colorado. The state of Texas claims it’s the hottest sales area for pickup trucks. Trucks are seen all over this state, too.

I’ve had my share this model year, having reviewed the Chev Silverado Trail Boss, the Ford Raptor and new Ranger along with the Lariat 4X4, the GMC Sierra 1500 Denali, the new Jeep Gladiator, the Ram 1500 Longhorn and Rebel along with the HD 2500 Tradesman, and Toyota Tacoma and Tundra.

The midsize Ranger and Gladiator will compete with representative compacts Toyota Tacoma, Chevy Colorado, GMC Canyon and Nissan Frontier for market share.

The rugged Frontier, which has received little upgrading from Nissan since 2004, is expected to show a new face for 2020, and Ram, which hasn’t had a midsize model since killing the Dakota in 2010, is working on a new one for, perhaps, 2021. Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, parent company of Jeep and Ram, has indicated any new midsize model from Ram will not closely copy the offroad-capable Gladiator.

The 2020 Jeep Gladiator during a drive at The Fort, near Morrison.

I drove early one morning to Morrison, near where the 2020 Gladiator was being shown at The Fort Restaurant. While I was  preparing to drive the Gladiator, Norm Fryer of Automotive Media Solutions showed up to exchange vehicles with me – delivering to me the 2019 Ford F-150 4X4 Lariat SuperCrew with V-8 power and taking away the new BMW X7 full-size SUV crossover, which I had driven up there from my home.

The 70-mile drive home in the F-150 was a pleasure; the smooth-shifting 10-speed automatic transmission was tied to the 395-horsepower, 5.0-liter V-8 with 400 lb.-ft. of torque. The noticeable difference in Ford’s V-8 from its line of powerful V-6s is in fuel mileage. With more than 50 percent of my drive time on the highway last week with the F-150, it averaged only 17.8 miles per gallon overall. I’ve normally averaged 20-mpg or higher with the 2.7, 3.3 and 3.5 six-cylinders for the half-ton.

The four-door crew cab, finished in velocity blue exterior, is stylish, as pickups go, and is all black inside, with comfortable leather. A roomy rear seating area is brightened from a full sunroof. Access is eased with deployable running boards.

Tailgate innovation is big news these days. As the Ford tailgate drops into open position, push a button in the top end and a 3-foot-wide step lowers into position along with a steadying rod beside it for safely climbing up into the pickup bed. Along with the Ford drop-down step, Ram is showing off a split tailgate, GMC has one which can be used in three positions from a two-step-up to a football tailgating capability, and Chevy has the convenient step-up at the ends of the rear bumper.

To have the V-8 power at hand, the added cost was $1,000. From the base price of $47,985 for the Lariat 4X4, options pushed sticker price to $64,555.

Its tow-capability is one of the best in the half-ton market, including Ford’s Pro Trailer Backup Assist system and trailer view. The popular option automatically backs a truck and trailer into tight parking space, with the driver participation simply turning a knob, keeping an eye on the rearview camera screen and occasionally braking.

Midsizers: Kia Telluride vs. Chevy Blazer

New crossovers Chevy Blazer, left, and Kia Telluride are competitors. (Bud Wells photo)

Parked side-by-side in my garage were two all-new midsize SUV crossovers – the 2020 Kia Telluride SX and ’19 Chevrolet Blazer Premier.

They’ll compete for sales success with more than a dozen other midsizers, including the redesigned Honda Passport, the new Subaru Ascent and the long-popular Jeep Grand Cherokee.

A first glance makes separation of the two as simple as black and white, dark graphite metallic for the Chevrolet and snow-white pearl for the Kia.

The two are near identically shaped at the rear, with lip of a spoiler atop the rear window. The distinguishing differences from the rear are the taillights – the Blazer’s horizontal and the Telluride’s vertical, and a “floating-roof” look for the Chev. Up front, the Blazer has more of a rake to its windshield, the Telluride stands taller and step-in height is the same for both at about 19 inches. The Blazer rides on 21-inch wheels, the Telluride 20.

The Telluride, the largest model ever offered by Kia, was unveiled at the Detroit Auto Show in January 2019. It has three rows of seats, and is considerably larger than the established Kia Sorento, which has been considered a “small midsize entry.”

The comfortable interior of the Kia Telluride. (Kia)

The Telluride, 5 inches longer than the Chevy Blazer, is 196.9 inches in overall length, 78.3 in width and 68.9 height. Chevy’s dimensions are 191.4 inches in overall length, 76.7 width and 67 height. Difference in curb weight is approximately 100 pounds, the Telluride at 4,317 pounds and the Blazer at 4,210.

The use of the Blazer model name on a Chevrolet is revival of an identification that was first used in 1969 on full-sized SUVs on a truck chassis known as the K5 Blazer. The compact S10 Blazer was added in 1982; both were discontinued in 2005. A TrailBlazer model was produced from 2001 to 2009.

A 292-horsepower, direct-injection 3.8-liter V-6 engine with 262 lb.-ft. of torque is tied to an 8-speed automatic transmission for the Kia. Performance gets a bit of boost in Sport mode, and passing power is more than adequate out on the highway. Properly equipped, the Telluride can tow up to 5,000 pounds.

The Chevrolet Blazer was an attraction at the Denver Auto Show. (Bud Wells)

The Chevy seems more responsive in low-end-rpm situations with its 308-hp, 3.6-liter V-6 (270 lb.-ft of torque) and paddle shifters to spur its 9-speed automatic transmission. Tow capacity for the Blazer is 4,500 pounds.

The Chevy carries a slight advantage in EPA highway fuel-mileage estimates, 25 to 24, but in my week while driving back-and-forth between the two, the Kia posted a bit higher averages than did the Chevy. Overall, it was 22.9 mpg for the Telluride and 21.9 for the Blazer.

The Kia sport ute has 21 cubic feet  of cargo space behind its third row of seats; fold down the back row and it expands to 46 cubic feet. The Blazer has 30.5 cubic feet behind its second row. Approach the rear of the Chevy with key in pocket at night and the Chevy bow-tie emblem is cast on the ground beneath the bumper; swing a foot over the emblem and the liftgate automatically opens.

The loaded-up, all-wheel-drive models are close in price; the Blazer at $49,290 and the Telluride at $47,255, including forward-collision avoidance alert and lane-keeping assist. The Blazer tag would have pushed past $50,000 with optional forward collision warning, automatic emergency braking and lane-keep assist. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard on the Chevy.

The Kia is built in West Point, Ga.; the Chevy Blazer in Ramos Arizpe, Mexico.

‘19 Toyota Prius gets partial AWD

I’d heard that Toyota, in Japan, had added all-wheel-drive technology to its Prius being sold there, so, at a meeting in Denver three years ago I asked Toyota executive David Lee if the company might do the same in Colorado.

“Probably not,” he said, adding that “the Prius has aimed its volume sales at sunshine states and to expect it, with an all-wheel-drive addition, to move into cold and snowy country would be a contradiction to the basis of the hybrid electricity success.”

But thinking changes, sometimes along the lines of a sales decline, of which the Prius has encountered in recent months.

“Yes, the time has come,” said Lee at the 2019 Denver Auto Show. And delivered to me was the 2019 Toyota Prius XLE AWD-e Hybrid. It isn’t a fully capable all-wheel-drive hatchback, but it has the basis for some assist from all four wheels.

For the front-wheel-drive Prius, Toyota has added a lightweight, 7-horsepower, magnetless electric motor to the rear wheels. From 0 to 6 miles an hour, the e-motor is automatically engaged, helping with startup speed and lending grip in icy conditions. From 6 to 43 mph, the AWD system is engaged only as needed, and, beyond 43, there is no AWD available. Thus, the Prius remains lacking for serious cold, snowy weather areas.

The Prius was one of the first gas/electric hybrids to come on the scene in the U.S., in 2000, and thoroughly dominated sales until three or four years ago, when large numbers of new hybrids took away sales. I’ve always considered the Prius one of the best of the hybrids for fair-weather driving.

The e-AWD model, with the boost to 6 miles per hour, was strong in takeoffs. The system offers driving modes of eco, power and electric.  My overall fuel-mileage average was 51.8 mpg.

Sticker price for the Prius AWD-e reached $32,146, including Entune audio, color head-up display, heated steering wheel, rain-sensing wipers, dynamic radar cruise, brake assist, lane-departure alert and blind-spot monitor.   

The Prius is built in Aichi, Japan.

Cadillac XT4 faces up to BMW, Audi subcompacts

The new 2019 Cadillac XT4 is one of larger luxury subcompact SUVs. (Bud Wells photos)

The littler luxuries (subcompacts) are latecomers to the years’-long takeover of the U.S. car market by SUVs and crossovers.

The newest of the newer premium luxury subcompacts are the Cadillac XT4 and Lexus UX, showing up in November and December.

Smaller than the Cadillac is the new Lexus UX, this one a hybrid.

They do sales battles with Audi Q3, BMW X1 and X2, Infiniti QX30, Jaguar E-Pace, Mercedes GLA-Class, Range Rover Evoque and Volvo XC40. They’re not big sellers yet, collectively capturing about 2 percent of the booming SUV/crossover market.

The XT4 retains the crisp, sharp, distinctive exterior lines of Cadillacs of recent years, likened somewhat to current Acura styling.

The XT4’s structure is one of the largest among luxury subcompacts; in fact, the new Cadillac is occasionally referred to as a compact. It rides on a wheelbase of 109.4 inches, is 181.1 inches in overall length, is 83.5 wide and 64.1 in height. Curb weight is 3,876 pounds. The Lexus UX is 6 inches shorter and 250 pounds lighter.

The 2019 XT4 All-Wheel-Drive Premium Luxury review model came my way last week. It joins the XT5 midsize crossover and the Escalade full-size SUV for Cadillac. Soon to arrive will be the three-row XT6, which will fill a gap between the XT5 and Escalade.

Of the changing lineup for the brand’s SUVs/crossovers, Cadillac president Steve Carlisle said, “The first-ever Cadillac XT6 delivers a compelling blend of spaciousness, safety and convenience features. It joins the all-new XT4, which has soared to the top spot in its segment, our global best-selling XT5 and the iconic Escalade.”

A newly designed 2.0-liter, turbocharged 4-cylinder engine of 237 horsepower and 258 lb.-ft. of torque teams with a 9-speed automatic transmission and twin-clutch AWD system with torque vectoring and a front disconnect to boost fuel mileage while in two-wheel drive.

Pushing the drive mode button in the XT4, I was given choice of Touring two-wheel-drive control, all-wheel drive or Sport AWD. Sport stiffens suspension and steering feel, and with use of paddle shifters I put the Cad through some dry offroad drills. It performed impressively, with good maneuvering grip, though with ground clearance of 6.7 inches probably not a contender for wintertime Jeep trails.

Response is quick and relatively smooth for the Cadillac 4-cylinder, and fuel mileage is decent, estimated at 22-to-29 miles per gallon. My overall average was 24.2.

The review model’s interior is gorgeous, with Sedona leather of shades between gold and caramel, contrasting perfectly with the black elsewhere. A centerstack juts outward for easy control by driver or front-seat passenger, and features Bose surround sound, providing phone connectivity with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.

Seating is roomy and comfortable, with an average amount of cargo space, 22.5 cubic feet, behind the rear seat.

Among options pushing the XT4’s sticker price to $54,785 from a base of $41,795 are lane-keep assist, automatic braking, adaptive cruise, front pedestrian braking, automatic parking assist, hands-free liftgate, ventilated front seats, sunroof, head-up display, navigation with real-time traffic, wireless charging and cabin air ionizer.

The XT4 is built in a Cadillac assembly plant in Kansas City, Kan.

Alfa Romeo Giulia: low number, high impact

A lively sport sedan is the 2019 Giulia Ti all-wheel-drive model. (Bud Wells photos)

Curiosity abounds all around, with regards to Alfa Romeo.

Few of the Italian marque are seen in these parts, yet several times as I parked and exited the 2019 Giulia sport sedan, someone would ask, “Is that an Alfa Romeo?”

The Alfa brand, absent from the U.S. for 20 years until the 4C Spider in 2015, seems to exude a level of respect whenever mentioned.

And its odd, colorful badge (you know, the cross and the snake swallowing a man) draws immediate attention. The red is the cross of the municipality of Milan, Italy, where Alfa Romeo was founded, and the green snake is open to various interpretations – take your pick.

The key to liking the four-door Giulia is to drive it. I said that about the 2017 model two years ago after maneuvering it into the Poudre Canyon, over Cameron Pass, down to Walden and on up to Laramie.

The new model I drove, the Giulia Ti Sport all-wheel drive, is the same – a great-handling, rear-drive-based sedan. Move the drive mode from normal to dynamic, and the crisper steering ties right into the brilliant handling and super grip.

Performance comes from a 280-horsepower, 2.0-liter, 4-cylinder engine turbocharged with direct-injection and mated to an 8-speed automatic transmission. It’s quick, with 306 lb.-ft. of torque, and is a delight in the Rockies with manual-mode shifting. Here’s where the flaw shows up – the 6 ½-inch-long aluminum paddles locked to the steering column, they’re so large they have the look of a shift-training setup for high school sophomores. Paddle shifters ought to be small, out of the way except to the touch of a finger for upshift or downshift.

The Giulia retained secure manners with its all-wheel-drive system in a late-season winter test in the rain and snow.

The Giulia is EPA-rated at 31 miles per gallon for highway driving; my overall fuel average was a decent 27.8. Alfa boldly compares the sport sedan to the BMW 3 series and Mercedes C Class, along with Volvo S60, Cadillac ATS and Audi A4.

Highlighting its exterior are the V-grille and low-level front sport fascia.

V-grille and colorful badge are identifiers for Alfa Romeo.

Most inviting in the Giulia’s interior, somewhat tight in the rear, are the red-finished sport leather seats (heated in both rows). Trunk space is only 12 cubic feet.

Two optional packages – added safety with forward-collision warning plus, adaptive cruise with stop and lane-departure warning, and Ti Sport AWD special of dark aluminum wheels and all-season performance tires, low-riding front sport fascia, red brake calipers and sport leather seats – played important role in pushing the Giulia’s $41,995 base price to a final sticker of $51,885.

Among other options were Harman Kardon audio, Bluetooth, navigation, leather dash and vesuvio gray metallic exterior paint.

Alfa Romeo, owned by Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, produces the Giulia, 4C Spider and Stelvio SUV for the U.S. market.

Back then. . . . .1979 Ford Courier

The Ford Courier was imported from Japan. (Bud Wells photo)

(My first review of a pickup was 40 years ago, the mini-built Ford Courier, which appeared in The Denver Post on April 7, 1979. The Courier was provided by the Denver regional office of Ford Motor Co. Following are excerpts:)

Nearly 10 percent of new trucks sold in the U.S. last year were of the mini-pickup variety.

Driving about Denver in a Ford Courier puts the growing popularity and acceptance of the little units in an understandable light. Because of their small stature, the minis are easy to handle, economical and they’ll carry a somewhat respectable load.

The optional 2300-cc, 4-cylinder engine is a good runner and strong enough to handle the duties required of such a vehicle. Cold-blooded tendency is overcome with a manual choke. Mechanically-minded purchasers will be delighted withal the room beneath the hood.

Frequent downshifting is required in city driving, but the 4-speed transmission is an easy shifter. The Courier produced an average of 17.5 miles per gallon of fuel in start-and-stop town driving. The EPA rates the Courier at 22 miles per gallon.

Built for Ford by Toyo Kogyo of Japan, the Courier carries a base price of $4,861, including white-sidewall tires, power front disc brakes, 6-foot box and 4-speed transmission.

Optional items included the 2300 engine (2000 is standard) for $174.20, AM push-button radio for $78.90, tinted glass $28.30, swing-lock western mirrors $51.80 and rear step bumper $83.60. Freight charges of $110 brought the pickup’s price to $5,387.80. An unusual enclosed rear body was mounted on the Courier, pushing the vehicle’s value to $7,094.55.

The Courier, on a wheelbase of 106.9 inches, has a 1,400-pound capacity for cargo and passengers. Wing windows aid ventilation in the cab, and the unit possesses a fast, effective heater.

Lexus adds UX hybrid to subcompacts

The new Lexus UX250h gets all-wheel drive from electric boost. (Bud Wells photo)

It’s an odd-color green on the 2019 Lexus UX 250h all-wheel-drive review model I piloted in February. Nori green pearl, Lexus calls it, somewhat like the olive green on a Jeep.

This is no Jeep. It is Lexus’ new luxury subcompact SUV, a hybrid which gains AWD capability through use of an electric motor-generator which drives the rear wheels. It is based on the platform of the fun-but-quirky-looking Toyota C-HR, which showed up a year ago.

The Japanese-built UX will battle for sales in the luxury subcompact category against such strong entries as the Audi Q3, BMW X2, Cadillac XT4, Infiniti QX30, Jaguar E-Pace, Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class, Range Rover Evoque and Volvo XC40.

The UX 250h all-wheel-drive model is powered by a 2.0-liter, 4-cylinder gas engine, an electric motor up front and another at the back, where also is a nickel-metal hydride battery pack. The motor at the rear is the source of power to the rear wheels, as there is no driveshaft. The electric motor-generator drives the rear wheels up to 45 miles per hour, and beyond that the UX performs in front-drive. The gas/electric power sources are  tied to a continuously variable transmission.

The hybrid addition lifts the UXh’s estimated fuel mileage to 41 in town and 38 on the highway. My overall average was 33.2, reduced some by two mornings of driving in 8-below-zero temperatures.

The new subcompact is also offered in nonhybrid form as the Lexus UX200, a front-wheel-drive vehicle with a 169-horsepower, 4-cylinder gas engine. The UX250h, with its gas/electric combination, is rated at 181 horsepower. Its electric boost off the line makes it quicker than the nonhybrid model.

The UX250h is small, with a 103.9-inch wheelbase and overall length of 177 inches, yet because of the battery pack and electric motors it carries a hefty 3,605-pound curb weight. It rides on Bridgestone 225/50RF18 tires.

Space is very tight in the rear cargo area; only 17 cubic feet, short of the 19-24 range of its luxury subcompact competitors. I realized how short when our load of supplies from Costco in Timnath had to be divided between the cargo and rear seats. It’s the battery pack and a sloped roofline that steal away space, for the non-hybrid version of the UX has available more cubic feet than the hybrid.

Golden leatherette-finished seats (heated and cooled) and dash pads embellished the interior. Some difficulty arose with use of the remote touch controller for infotainment, though the simple and quick-response voice command eased the situation. A couple of interior “bugs” I’ve complained about in other Lexus models are the “ears” protruding from each side of a cover atop the gauge panel. They’re dials for snow/traction and for shifting between comfort and sport modes and seem out of place. These are key decision choices for a driver while maneuvering; of absolutely no concern to other passengers, and ought to be more unobtrusively placed.

The Lexus UX250h shows a relatively reasonable base price of $34,000. Add to that navigation and premium sound system, triple-beam LED headlamps, cornering lamps, blind-spot monitor, rear cross-traffic alert with braking, moonroof and heated steering wheel, and the sticker total reaches $42,050.

Lexus now has a full line of SUV/crossovers. The lineup and starting prices include, at the top, the large LX at $86,080; the GX at $52,355; the RX Hybrid at $46,095; the RX at $43,670; the NX Hybrid at $38,835; the NX at $36,485; the UX Hybrid at $34,000; the UX at $32,000.

Cold, speed take toll on range-plus Leaf

Sleek, sporty styling adds interest to Nissan Leaf Plus electric. (Bud Wells photos)

With bigger battery pack for more competitive range, and sporty and appealing new exterior styling, the all-electric 2019 Nissan Leaf Plus rolled quietly into my possession during the Denver Auto Show in late March.

The new Plus version, fully charged, is expected to deliver 226 miles of driving range, a nice increase over the 150 of the standard Leaf, and within a dozen or so miles of range claims by the Chevy Bolt and Kia Niro.

From a V-motion grille to a “floating roof” and all the way back to distinctive taillights, the Leaf Plus has unveiled mainstream beauty to complement its electric power.

When Jan and I left the auto show on a Wednesday night, we had awaiting us Thursday morning an excellent test drive for the electrified Nissan, though a sad mission. It would be a 100-mile drive to the Christ United Methodist Church in Sterling for the funeral of friend Norma Amen Weber.

When I showed up many years ago for my first class at Sterling High School, as an unknown freshman transfer from Wray, we were seated alphabetically; in the back row it was Weber, then Wells. I said “Hi” to the friendly faced, curly haired kid next to me, Justin Weber, and we’ve been friends since. Justin was married to Norma Amen (a classmate and friend of Jan’s) for more than 60 years before her recent death.

As we left Greeley for Sterling, not only was it cold, windy and rainy, we also were running late. So, when I accessed I76 at Wiggins (75-miles-per-hour speed limit) I kicked the Leaf Plus up to 80 mph in order that we reach the service in  time. We did, with 5 minutes to spare and only 67 miles of charge remaining in the Nissan battery pack.

Fortunately, Wendy Payne of Nissan and Paul Shippey of Automobile Media Solutions at the auto show had furnished me information regarding a quick-charge station at Fort Morgan, and, with 20 miles left, we added more than 100 miles of charge in 30 minutes there for the final leg home.

The weather and the higher speeds took a toll on the Leaf’s range; the realities of driving on occasion will not match perfectly to the car’s specifications.

The expanded battery pack pushes the Leaf Plus’s curb weight to 3,850 pounds, about 300 more than the standard Leaf. The Leaf Plus can handle that, though, for its electric motor is rated at 215 horsepower and 250 lb.-ft. of torque, compared to 147-hp and 236-torque for the standard.

The Plus offered a good ride and comfortable interior; aiding stability is the face the battery pack is flat and positioned beneath the floor in the center of the car. This also preserves 23.6 cubic feet of cargo space behind the second row of seats. Many electric autos use that space for the battery storage.

Regenerative braking helps recapture some energy for the battery store, and Nissan’s e-Pedal allows driving with one pedal, as braking is in effect whenever pressure is released on the accelerator. The Leaf Plus is equipped with emergency braking, lane-correction, rear cross-traffic alert, blind-spot warning and around-view monitor.

Pricing for the base-model S Plus begins around $32,000 ($6,000 higher  than the base Leaf), while the well-equipped Leaf PlusSL Tech review model carried a price tag in the $45,000 range.

Bullitt, Ram, Ascent tops at auto show

Making its debut Wednesday in Denver was the 2020 Jeep Gladiator. (Jan Wells photo)

Entries into the midsize truck market by Ford and Jeep were “big” draws at the 2019 Denver Auto Show, which ended a five-day run in late March at the Colorado Convention Center.

Ford drew its share of attention at the opening of the show, first for what was there – the resurrected Ford Ranger – and, also, for what wasn’t there – the Mustang Bullitt. Jeep unveiled the 2020 Gladiator, its first pickup since the Comanche went away in 1992.

The Ranger, with larger dimensions and roomier interior, is back after an absence of seven years, and along with the Gladiator will take aim at hot-selling rivals Toyota Tacoma and Chevy Colorado, as well as the GMC Canyon and Nissan Frontier.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is FordMustangBullittTrib-1024x768.jpg
Car of the Year at Denver Auto Show is the Ford Mustang Bullitt. (Jan Wells photo)

The Ford Mustang Bullitt, at the Gala Tuesday night kicking off the car show, was named Car of the Year in voting by members of the Rocky Mountain Automotive Press. The Ram 1500 was chosen Truck of the Year and Subaru Ascent is SUV of the Year.

Thirty minutes following those awards, presented by RMAP president Craig Conover, Leonard Kanonik was the first of many mentioning to me that the large Ford display didn’t include a Bullitt.

Crowds poured into the convention center hall Wednesday evening at the official opening of the show. Up front at the showroom floor were Toyota and Chevrolet displays; the Toyota lineup included its first-to-the-U.S., all-wheel-drive capable Prius Hybrid AWD-e.

The Ram 1500 was named Truck of the Year at the auto show. (Jan Wells photo)

To earn Car of the Year honors, the ’19 Bullitt was picked ahead of the ’19 Volkswagen Jetta, ’18 Mazda6 Signature and ’18 BMW M5. The ’19 Ram outpolled the ’18 Ford F-150 Raptor and GMC Sierra AT4 as Truck of the Year; the ’19 Ascent was chosen as top SUV over the Volkswagen Atlas, Nissan Rogue SL and Chevrolet Traverse, all ‘18s.

After first glance at the impressive 2019 Ford Ranger on the floor of the Colorado Convention Center, an oft-heard comment was, “It is much larger than the old one.”  How much bigger? After an absence of seven years, the Ranger returns with wheelbase which has grown by 1 ½ inches, overall length is more than a foot longer, width is more, its taller and curb weight is 700 pounds heavier at 4,200.

The four-door Gladiator, which goes on sale in the coming month, is 219 inches in overall length, 31 inches longer than the Wrangler Unlimited four-door. An 8-speed automatic transmission or 6-speed manual will be available with the 3.6-liter Pentastar V-6 engine (up to 7,650 pounds tow capacity). A 3.0-liter ecodiesel V-6 will be available for 2020.

The Subaru Ascent outpolled three other finalists as SUV of the Year. (Jan Wells photo)

I’ve driven the 2019 Ford Ranger Lariat SuperCrew 4X4, the most expensive trim level for the truck. Its sticker price is $45,190. The cheapest Ranger 4X4 is the XL SuperCab, which begins around $29,000.

Power is from a 2.3-liter EcoBoost 4-cylinder, with 10-speed automatic transmission. There is no lack of power, though occasionally in low speeds it seems often to move up two or three gears and lug a bit, then awaits coaxing to drop down to more responsive rpm.

With the optional FX4 OffRoad package, suspension has been firmed up. It rides on Hankook 265/60R18 tires.

Its 20.7 fuel-mileage average is higher than I’ve attained in a Toyota Tacoma or Nissan Frontier. The only gas-engined compact truck that has topped the Ranger for me was a 2018 GMC Canyon with 3.6-liter V-6 that averaged 21.2 last summer.

Back and forth at the auto show

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is TimBudGeorge.jpg

Tim Jackson, Bud Wells and George Karl await opening of the Denver Auto Show. (Tim Jackson photo)

Standing alone at the entrance to the convention center auto show floor, popular Nuggets’ coach George Karl graciously agreed to have his photo taken with me, and with Tim Jackson. Might he coach again? Well, he didn’t say no. . . . . What Cadillac might have been the favorite automobile through the years for Debi Medved, stylish wife of megadealer John Medved. It wasn’t a Cadillac at all, she told me at the car show – it was the big, burly Hummer H2. “And I also drove the Hummer H1 and Hummer H3, and liked them, too,” she said. The Hummer went out of production in 2009. . . . . Amid all the glitter of the new cars, Grand Junction Republican freshman representative Matt Soper, with Sarah, expressed his eagerness for the legislation task at the State Capitol. He represents Mesa and Delta counties. . . . . Seeking late-night dessert at Peaks on the 27th floor of Hyatt Regency Denver following the Tuesday night Gala preceding Denver Auto Show, Mike Van Duzer, of Chicago, made room at crowded bar for Jan and me to order, then bought our fondue dessert for us. Van Duzer, in Denver for US Foods convention at the Hyatt, is a big baseball fan, and happy for Denver over signing of Nolan Aranado, but not sure the Rockies will prevail over his Cubbies this season. . . . . Victory Motors Ram/Jeep dealer Steve Maneotis, of Craig, was thrilled to come across Villager publisher Bob Sweeney at the show. Sweeney, who published the Craig paper before moving to Denver and opening the Villager, was a friend of Maneotis’ father, Tom, in Craig. . . . . Jan and I, enjoying the early Wednesday morning street view from Starbucks on the Sixteenth Street Mall, saw a familiar face from 15 years ago, that of Derrick Johnson, delivering bakery goods to a lower level. Back in the early 2000s, he delivered new cars to me from Thompson Communications, including a rear-drive BMW which became stuck in deep snow two blocks from my home in Greeley and had to be towed to the driveway. He’s now a lead driver for Izzio Bakery.

Smaller Equinox very comfy

Since its resizing, the 2019 Equinox competes in the compact crossover field. (Bud Wells photo)

As General Motors pursued plans for eliminating several Chevy and Cadillac sedans and shutting down some car plants, a bright spot in the middle of all the discussion is the Equinox, one of the five best-selling compact SUV crossovers in the country.

Those of us who have been around for quite a while still think of GM and Chevrolet for their big, tough, good-riding SUVs – the Suburbans, Tahoes and Yukons. Chev’s bread-and-butter models, though, are the Equinox and Traverse crossovers.

The Equinox, on its unveiling in 2004 as an ’05, was the company’s first departure from those truck-based sport utes. It was a practical alternative for families seeking to lower their investment in car-carrying responsibilities.

Five years after its introduction, the midsize Equinox was redesigned, then a year ago it took on a new look and was resized into a compact crossover. A shedding of 400 pounds let it run lighter and more efficiently.

The new 2019 Equinox, 5 inches shorter than the ’17 model, shapes up very close in dimensions to one of its primary rivals, the Jeep Cherokee. Here is the comparison: Wheelbase- Chevy 107.3 inches, Jeep 106.5; Length- Chevy 183.1, Jeep 182; Width- Chevy 72.6, Jeep 73.2; Height- Chevy 65.4, Jeep 65.7.

Experiencing the comfort, handling and performance of the Chevy was enjoyable. Seating is very supportive and the MyLink infotainment system, including Android Auto and Apple CarPlay, is user-friendly. The interior was very quiet; heavy use of plastic detracted somewhat.

The Equinox took a hit on cargo space through its resizing last year; its 29.9 cubic feet behind the rear seats is smaller than most compact competitors.

The review model I drove was equipped with the optional 252-horsepower, 2.0-liter turbocharged 4-cylinder engine, and, mated to a 9-speed automatic transmission, was impressive. Good low-end torque got it off the line okay, and it was smooth at higher speeds and on demands for passing other traffic. Fuel mileage estimates are 22/28, and my overall average was 26.3. It has the stop/start fuel-saving feature. Turning circle of the Equinox is a bit wider than most competitors; it rides on Hankook 235/50R19 tires.

 Base engine is a 170-hp, 1.5-liter turbo 4-cylinder with 6-speed automatic transmission. To opt for this engine is to give up quick, smooth shifts and contend with quite a power decline, though this combo carries a good EPA rating of 26/32 mpg.

The well-equipped Premier edition of the Equinox needed only one optional package, Confidence and Convenience at an added cost of $2,145. It included eight-way power front passenger seat, ventilated front seats, heated second-row seats, heated steering wheel, low-speed forward automatic braking, forward-collision alert, lane-keep assist with lane-departure warning, following-distance indicator, safety alert seat, automatic high-beam control, adaptive cruise control, front pedestrian braking and surround vision.

This brought sticker price to $37,745. Among standard items are a hands-free power liftgate, remote vehicle start, dual-zone automatic climate control and wireless charging device. Cheapest Equinox AWD trim level begins at around $26,500. The Equinox is built in Ingersoll, Ontario, Canada.